How to Write an Offering Memorandum When the Loan Matured

$936 billion in commercial real estate loans mature in 2026. That's not a refinance queue — it's a year of forced conversations about what a property is worth when the owner can't just roll the debt.

Trepp estimates more than half of the maturing CMBS loans could default. Multifamily maturities alone jump 56% this year to $162.1 billion. The maturity wall is real, it's arriving now, and the inventory it generates is already landing in investors' inboxes.

Buyers know the numbers. They read the same data. When a new deal arrives in this environment, their first assumption isn't "what does this property earn?" — it's "why is this hitting the market right now?"

An offering memorandum for a maturity-driven sale has one job the standard OM doesn't: answer that question before they have to ask it.

The comp problem

When buyers suspect a motivated seller, they look for permission to pay less. They find the most recent distressed sales in the submarket and anchor there. They don't search for reasons to bid higher — they search for comps that justify the number they've already decided on.

If your OM doesn't address the sale context, you've handed them that permission. The absence of explanation is itself a signal. Experienced investors fill information gaps with the most conservative interpretation available to them.

This is a framing problem, not a numbers problem. A stress test shows what happens if market conditions worsen. This is about establishing where the conversation starts — getting buyers to anchor to voluntary comp sales, not distressed ones, before the first bid comes in.

What changes in the document

A maturity-driven sale doesn't need a different OM structure. It needs different content decisions at three points.

The investment thesis section

Most OMs bury this. Two paragraphs after the property overview, before the financial summary. Investors skip it.

When the context suggests a motivated seller, the investment thesis earns its own space. It needs to explain why this property is being sold now — not defensively, but matter-of-factly. "Loan maturity, 10-year hold, planned disposition" is a complete answer that immediately distinguishes an orderly exit from a distress situation.

Then move fast to the thesis itself: occupancy trend, rent growth, submarket conditions. The logic should be clear — the property has performed, the market supports the price, and the seller's timeline doesn't change either fact.

Financing history

Standard OMs skip this. For a maturity sale, a short paragraph is worth including. Not a full debt schedule — just enough to show the loan was performing and the property generated cash flow throughout the hold.

Office markets are providing the contrast right now. Brookfield paid $25 million down on its $835 million One New York Plaza loan in early March just to buy a two-year extension. That kind of situation is in investors' heads when they see a new deal. The OM's job is to establish — clearly and early — that your deal isn't that.

Comparable selection

If there are distressed sales in your submarket from the last 18 months, acknowledge them and explain why they're not the right comparison. Different occupancy, different credit profile, different sale circumstances.

If you leave comp selection to the buyer, they'll choose the ones that support the discount they want. The OM sets the frame or the investor does.

What not to do

Don't hide the maturity date. It's in the county records. If a buyer misses it before the LOI, they'll find it in due diligence and revisit every number they accepted at face value.

Don't apologize for it either. Loan maturities aren't defaults. A 10-year hold with a planned exit is a normal cycle. Treating the maturity date as something to minimize signals more than it explains.

The NOI anchor

Everything in a commercial real estate deal eventually reduces to NOI. The strongest thing a maturity-driven offering memorandum can do is make the property's operating performance the dominant narrative.

The T12 (trailing 12-month operating statement) and T3 (trailing 3-month annualized) need to match the rent roll. If they do, that consistency is evidence: this property is generating income on schedule, not performing under duress.

If there's a gap between the T12 and the rent roll, explain it before the investor calculates it themselves. An explained discrepancy is a negotiating detail. An unexplained one is a red flag.

The 2026 context

19% more loan maturities this year than last year means more of this inventory hitting the market than in 2025. Buyers will have options — and patience. That's all the more reason to separate your deal from the pack before anyone gets on the phone.

An offering memorandum that clearly establishes operating performance, voluntary comparable sales, and a clean exit narrative competes differently in this environment than one that leaves those questions open.

Most maturity-driven OMs leave those questions open. The framing gets left to broker calls. By then, the investor has already formed a view from the document.

That gap is worth closing before the first showing request comes in.

---

*DealDraft builds fully structured offering memorandums — financials, investment thesis, comparable sections — in a fraction of the time it takes manually. [Start at dealdraft.online](https://dealdraft.online).*