Multifamily Investment in San Francisco
San Francisco multifamily's holding steady while office implodes around it. Tech layoffs knocked some wind out of rent growth, but we're not seeing the bloodbath everyone predicted in 2022. Cap rates compressed to the 4.0%-4.8% range for quality assets. Rent control's always the elephant in the room here, but smart operators are still making money. The conversion pipeline from distressed office is real - expect more supply in 3-5 years. For now, it's a story of stable cash flow in an otherwise volatile market.
Market Context
Cap Rate Range
4.0%-4.8% for stabilized assets, with newer construction trading closer to 4.0% and older rent-controlled buildings pushing 5.2%
Current Vacancy
6.8% physical vacancy, though economic vacancy runs higher due to rent control rollbacks on turnover
Rent Trend
Flat to down 2% year-over-year, but loss-to-lease opportunity averaging 18-22% on rent-controlled units
Absorption
New supply absorption running 65-75 days, slower than historical 45-day average
Price Per Unit Trend
Down 8-12% from 2021 peaks, currently $485K-$750K per unit depending on submarket and vintage
Transaction Volume
Down 35% year-over-year, but activity picking up in Q1 2026 as interest rates stabilize
Submarket Analysis
SOMA/Mission Bay
4.2%-4.6% capVacancy
8.2%
Avg Rent (1BR)
$3,850
Tech recovery stabilizing demand, new supply pressure easing
OM Tip
Highlight proximity to major tech campuses and transportation. Include competitor rent surveys from new buildings.
Mission District
4.8%-5.4% capVacancy
5.8%
Avg Rent (1BR)
$3,200
Strong fundamentals, heavy rent control exposure limits upside
OM Tip
Loss-to-lease analysis is critical. Show natural turnover rates and renovation potential for non-controlled units.
Richmond/Sunset
4.4%-5.0% capVacancy
4.9%
Avg Rent (1BR)
$2,950
Family-oriented demand holding up well, less volatile than downtown
OM Tip
Emphasize stable tenant base and lower turnover. Include parking ratios - it matters out here.
Nob Hill/Russian Hill
4.0%-4.5% capVacancy
7.1%
Avg Rent (1BR)
$4,200
Premium location premium intact, high-income tenant base resilient
OM Tip
Focus on building character and views. Include recent sales comps for similar vintage buildings in the area.
Castro/Noe Valley
4.3%-4.8% capVacancy
5.2%
Avg Rent (1BR)
$3,650
Tight supply, strong owner-occupant competition for smaller buildings
OM Tip
Highlight walkability scores and neighborhood amenities. Owner-user buyers will pay premiums here.
Performance by Vintage
0
P
1
r
2
e
3
-
4
1
5
9
6
7
7
9
8
9
b
10
u
11
i
12
l
13
d
14
i
15
n
16
g
17
s
18
19
c
20
a
21
r
22
r
23
y
24
25
t
26
h
27
e
28
29
h
30
e
31
a
32
v
33
i
34
e
35
s
36
t
37
38
r
39
e
40
n
41
t
42
43
c
44
o
45
n
46
t
47
r
48
o
49
l
50
51
b
52
u
53
r
54
d
55
e
56
n
57
58
b
59
u
60
t
61
62
o
63
f
64
f
65
e
66
r
67
68
t
69
h
70
e
71
72
b
73
i
74
g
75
g
76
e
77
s
78
t
79
80
l
81
o
82
s
83
s
84
-
85
t
86
o
87
-
88
l
89
e
90
a
91
s
92
e
93
94
u
95
p
96
s
97
i
98
d
99
e
100
101
-
102
103
t
104
y
105
p
106
i
107
c
108
a
109
l
110
l
111
y
112
113
2
114
5
115
-
116
3
117
5
118
%
119
120
b
121
e
122
l
123
o
124
w
125
126
m
127
a
128
r
129
k
130
e
131
t
132
133
o
134
n
135
136
l
137
o
138
n
139
g
140
-
141
t
142
e
143
r
144
m
145
146
t
147
e
148
n
149
a
150
n
151
t
152
s
153
.
154
155
1
156
9
157
8
158
0
159
s
160
-
161
1
162
9
163
9
164
0
165
s
166
167
s
168
t
169
o
170
c
171
k
172
173
p
174
e
175
r
176
f
177
o
178
r
179
m
180
s
181
182
b
183
e
184
s
185
t
186
187
o
188
p
189
e
190
r
191
a
192
t
193
i
194
o
195
n
196
a
197
l
198
l
199
y
200
201
w
202
i
203
t
204
h
205
206
r
207
e
208
a
209
s
210
o
211
n
212
a
213
b
214
l
215
e
216
217
c
218
o
219
n
220
t
221
r
222
o
223
l
224
225
e
226
x
227
p
228
o
229
s
230
u
231
r
232
e
233
234
a
235
n
236
d
237
238
l
239
o
240
w
241
e
242
r
243
244
c
245
a
246
p
247
e
248
x
249
250
n
251
e
252
e
253
d
254
s
255
.
256
257
2
258
0
259
0
260
0
261
s
262
263
c
264
o
265
n
266
s
267
t
268
r
269
u
270
c
271
t
272
i
273
o
274
n
275
276
d
277
e
278
a
279
l
280
s
281
282
w
283
i
284
t
285
h
286
287
h
288
i
289
g
290
h
291
e
292
r
293
294
d
295
e
296
n
297
s
298
i
299
t
300
y
301
302
z
303
o
304
n
305
i
306
n
307
g
308
309
b
310
u
311
t
312
313
f
314
a
315
c
316
e
317
s
318
319
d
320
e
321
f
322
e
323
r
324
r
325
e
326
d
327
328
m
329
a
330
i
331
n
332
t
333
e
334
n
335
a
336
n
337
c
338
e
339
340
i
341
s
342
s
343
u
344
e
345
s
346
.
347
348
P
349
o
350
s
351
t
352
-
353
2
354
0
355
1
356
0
357
358
b
359
u
360
i
361
l
362
d
363
i
364
n
365
g
366
s
367
368
c
369
o
370
m
371
m
372
a
373
n
374
d
375
376
p
377
r
378
e
379
m
380
i
381
u
382
m
383
384
r
385
e
386
n
387
t
388
s
389
390
b
391
u
392
t
393
394
t
395
r
396
a
397
d
398
e
399
400
a
401
t
402
403
t
404
h
405
e
406
407
t
408
i
409
g
410
h
411
t
412
e
413
s
414
t
415
416
c
417
a
418
p
419
420
r
421
a
422
t
423
e
424
s
425
,
426
427
u
428
s
429
u
430
a
431
l
432
l
433
y
434
435
s
436
u
437
b
438
-
439
4
440
.
441
5
442
%
443
444
f
445
o
446
r
447
448
q
449
u
450
a
451
l
452
i
453
t
454
y
455
456
a
457
s
458
s
459
e
460
t
461
s
462
.
What Your OM Needs to Address
Rent Roll Breakdown by Control Status
Separate controlled vs. market-rate units with move-in dates and last increase history
Data to Include
Unit-by-unit analysis showing years of tenancy, current rent vs. market rent, estimated loss-to-lease by unit
Capital Improvement Pass-Through Analysis
Document completed and planned improvements eligible for rent increases under local ordinances
Data to Include
Historical capital expenditures, current deferred maintenance estimates, projected improvement costs with corresponding rent increase potential
Ellis Act Risk Assessment
Address potential for tenant activism or conversion restrictions in the submarket
Data to Include
Recent Ellis Act filings in the area, tenant organization activity, estimated costs for voluntary relocation if needed
Comparable Sales Per Unit Analysis
Break down recent transactions by vintage, size, and rent control exposure
Data to Include
Sales comps with per-unit pricing, percentage rent-controlled units, cap rates, and days on market for similar assets
Operating Expense Benchmarking
San Francisco has unique cost pressures - utilities, insurance, and compliance costs run high
Data to Include
Three-year expense history with peer benchmarking, projected insurance increases, utility expense per unit comparisons
Zoning and Density Bonus Potential
Many older buildings sit on lots with additional development rights or ADU potential
Data to Include
Current zoning designation, maximum allowable density, ADU conversion feasibility study, estimated development costs and returns
Investment Outlook
Short Term
Next 12-18 months look stable but not exciting. Tech hiring's picking up but slowly. Rent growth will stay muted while the market works through oversupply in certain submarkets. Best opportunities are distressed sellers who bought at peak pricing.
Medium Term
2027-2029 could see real rent growth return as new supply slows and tech recovery gains steam. Office-to-residential conversions will add supply, but mostly in SOMA where we already have excess. Rent control reform isn't happening, so focus on assets with natural turnover.
Long Term
San Francisco's not going anywhere. Long-term fundamentals remain strong - job growth, limited land, and California housing shortage all support values. Climate change might actually help as people move away from fire-prone areas. Biggest risk is more aggressive rent control expansion.
Buyer Profile
Institutional buyers still active for $20M+ assets. High-net-worth individuals and family offices dominating the $5M-$20M range. Owner-users paying premiums for smaller buildings in premium locations. Foreign capital mostly sidelined due to financing costs.
Marketing a multifamily property in San Francisco?
DealDraft generates professional offering memorandums with market-specific data and property-type expertise built in.
Create Your OM